Skip to main content

Garcia v. Raytheon Employees Disability Trust

D.N.H.December 4, 2000No. CIV. 98-595-BCited 3 times
Defendant WinRaytheon
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Barbadoro
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

MetLife's decision to terminate Garcia's disability benefits was upheld as reasonable and supported by substantial evidence. The court granted defendant's motion for judgment on the administrative record and denied plaintiff's motion.

What This Ruling Means

# Garcia v. Raytheon Employees Disability Trust **What Happened** Garcia filed a lawsuit claiming that MetLife, which administered disability benefits through Raytheon's employee trust, wrongfully terminated his disability payments. Garcia argued this violated the terms of the disability plan. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with MetLife and upheld the decision to stop Garcia's benefits. The judge found that MetLife had solid evidence supporting its termination decision and followed proper procedures. Garcia's request for the court to reverse MetLife's action was denied. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that courts give significant weight to insurance companies' decisions about disability benefits. If your disability benefits are terminated, the burden falls on you to prove the decision was unreasonable—not the other way around. Workers facing benefit denials should gather strong medical evidence and documentation to challenge insurance company decisions. It highlights the importance of understanding your disability plan's terms and keeping detailed records of your medical condition.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.