Skip to main content

Carpenters Local Union No. 329 v. State Ex Rel. Department of Labor

OKLACIVAPPJuly 14, 2000No. 92,676Cited 10 times
Defendant WinCarpenters Local Union No. 329$7,440 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Adams, Hansen, Joplin
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftBreach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the administrative law judge's order requiring the union local to pay back wages, rejecting the local's arguments regarding preemption, waiver, at-will employment, and unjust enrichment.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Local Ordered to Pay Back Wages to Worker** This case involved a dispute between a worker and Carpenters Local Union No. 329 over unpaid wages. The worker claimed the union local failed to pay wages they were owed and broke their employment contract. The union argued they shouldn't have to pay, raising several defenses including that the worker was employed "at-will" (meaning they could be fired for any reason) and that federal labor law prevented the state from getting involved. The court sided with the worker. An administrative law judge initially ordered the union local to pay $7,440 in back wages to the worker. When the union appealed this decision, the appellate court upheld the original ruling, rejecting all of the union's arguments about why they shouldn't have to pay. This case matters for workers because it shows that even unions - organizations that typically advocate for workers' rights - must follow wage and hour laws when they act as employers. Workers have the right to receive all wages they've earned, regardless of whether their employer is a private company, government agency, or labor union. The ruling reinforces that employment contracts must be honored and wage theft claims will be taken seriously by courts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.