Skip to main content

Teamsters Local Union No. 117 v. State, Doc

Wash. Ct. App.July 18, 2008No. 60073-7-I
Plaintiff WinWashington State Department of Corrections
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Grosse
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the trial court's summary judgment dismissal, holding that the Teamsters union had associational standing to bring wage claims on behalf of SERT members and that material issues of fact existed regarding compensability of on-call pager time.

What This Ruling Means

**Prison Workers Win Right to Fight for On-Call Pay** This case involved prison employees represented by Teamsters Local Union 117 who were required to carry pagers while on-call but weren't paid for that time. The workers argued they should receive wages for being available to respond to emergencies, even when not actively working at the prison. The state's Department of Corrections disagreed and refused to pay for on-call time. Initially, a lower court dismissed the case entirely, ruling that the union couldn't even bring the lawsuit on behalf of its members. However, the appeals court overturned this decision. The appeals court ruled that the union did have the legal right to sue the state for unpaid wages on behalf of the prison workers. The court sent the case back to the lower court to determine whether the workers should actually be paid for their on-call time. This decision matters for workers because it establishes that unions can fight wage disputes in court on behalf of their members. It also opens the door for employees to potentially get paid for time spent on-call with pagers or similar devices, recognizing that being available for work has value even when not actively performing duties.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.