Skip to main content

Teamsters Local Union No. 117 v. Dept. Of Corrections

Wash. Ct. App.January 22, 2014No. 43604-3
Defendant WinWashington State Department of Corrections
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed PERC's dismissal of Cherry's unfair labor practice complaint, holding that chapter 41.80 RCW does not protect public employees' 'concerted activities' and that Cherry's two emails were not protected union activity.

What This Ruling Means

**Teamsters Union Challenges Department of Corrections in Washington State** This case involved a dispute between Teamsters Local Union No. 117 and the Washington State Department of Corrections over employment-related issues affecting corrections workers. The union, which represents employees working in state prisons and correctional facilities, brought legal action against the department in what appears to be a disagreement over workplace conditions, benefits, or employment policies. Unfortunately, the available court records do not provide enough detail to determine what specific employment issues were at stake or how the Washington State Court of Appeals ultimately ruled in this 2014 case. The case was filed in January 2014, but the final outcome and reasoning behind the court's decision are not clear from the available information. **What This Means for Workers:** While the specific outcome is unknown, this case highlights how unions actively work to protect their members' rights in the workplace through the court system. When employment disputes arise between unions and government employers like state corrections departments, workers can seek legal remedies to address workplace concerns. The case demonstrates that even government employees have avenues to challenge employment decisions through their union representation and the courts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.