Skip to main content

Teamsters Local Union No. 117 v. Department of Corrections

Wash. Ct. App.April 7, 2008No. No. 60073-7-ICited 10 times
Plaintiff WinWashington State Department of Corrections
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Appelwick, Grosse, Leach
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellate court reversed summary judgment, holding that the Union had associational standing to pursue wage claims on behalf of SERT members and that material issues of fact precluded summary judgment on whether on-call pager time was compensable under the Washington Minimum Wage Act.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** The Teamsters Local Union No. 117 sued the Washington Department of Corrections over unpaid wages for members of the Special Emergency Response Team (SERT). The union claimed these corrections officers should have been paid for time they spent on-call, waiting to respond to emergencies. The trial court initially dismissed the case entirely without a trial, saying the union couldn't sue on behalf of its members and that the workers weren't entitled to the wages anyway. **What the court decided:** The Washington Court of Appeals reversed this dismissal and sent the case back to the lower court. The appeals court ruled that the union does have the right to sue for its members' wages. More importantly, the court found there were genuine questions about whether the on-call time should be paid and whether minimum wage laws applied to these workers – issues that needed to be decided at trial rather than dismissed outright. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling reinforces that unions can fight for members' wage claims in court. It also shows that courts must carefully examine on-call time situations rather than automatically assuming workers aren't owed pay. The decision gives workers hope that time spent waiting to work might be compensable, especially in emergency response roles.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.