Skip to main content

Central Transport, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

E.D. Mich.September 17, 1992No. 2:92-cv-71942Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Duggan
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Other labor litigation
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court denied defendants' motion for summary judgment and found it has subject matter jurisdiction under § 301 to hear the breach of contract claims. The case was remanded for further proceedings on the merits.

What This Ruling Means

# Central Transport, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (1992) ## What Happened Central Transport, Inc. had a dispute with the Teamsters union over a contract disagreement. The union filed a motion asking the court to dismiss the case immediately without a full trial, arguing there were no real facts to debate. ## What the Court Decided The court rejected the union's request to dismiss the case. The judge ruled that the court had the authority to hear breach of contract disputes under federal law and that the case needed to proceed to trial so both sides could present their evidence and arguments about whether the contract was actually broken. ## Why This Matters for Workers This decision established that courts can properly handle disputes between employers and unions over contract violations. It ensures that workers represented by unions have a meaningful chance to have their contract disputes heard in court rather than dismissed without examination. The case reinforces that contract agreements between employers and unions deserve serious judicial review when disagreements arise.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.