Samson Resources Co. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Carol M. Hansen
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Samson on its specific performance claim was affirmed as to one JOA where Samson accepted all of Amerada's interest, but reversed as to other interests where Samson elected to purchase only divided portions, holding that the maintenance of unit ownership clause required acceptance of entire interests.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.