Skip to main content

Tae-Si Kim v. Adam Kearney

9th CircuitNovember 26, 2013No. 12-15959
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Farris, Black, Ikuta
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Cumorah Credit Union, finding that the plaintiffs' quiet title claim was untimely filed (beyond the 90-day statutory window) and their slander of title claim failed because they were not good faith purchasers.

What This Ruling Means

**Kim v. Kearney: Employment Law Case Summary** This case involved an employment dispute between Tae-Si Kim and Adam Kearney that was heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in November 2013. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide enough detail to explain what specific employment issue was at the center of this dispute or what workplace problem Kim was trying to resolve. The court's decision in this case is also unclear from the available information. Without access to the full ruling or case details, it's impossible to determine whether Kim won or lost, or what specific legal principles the court applied in reaching its decision. **What This Means for Workers:** While the specifics of this case aren't available, it serves as a reminder that employment disputes can end up in federal appeals courts, which shows that workplace legal issues can be complex and significant. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals covers several western states and frequently hears important employment law cases that can affect workers' rights across that region. For workers facing employment issues, this case highlights the importance of keeping detailed records and seeking proper legal guidance when workplace problems arise.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.