Olga Hernandez v. Penny Pritzker
Case Details
- Citation
- 408 U.S. App. D.C. 188, 741 F.3d 129, 2013 WL 6767837, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25596, 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,979, 121 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 323
- Judge(s)
- Garland, Ginsburg, Sentelle
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- District of Columbia
- Circuit
- D.C. Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court affirmed summary judgment for the Department of Commerce on Hernandez's Title VII retaliation claims, finding she failed to produce sufficient evidence that the Department's stated reasons for detailing her, changing her probationary status, and terminating her employment were pretexts for retaliation.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.