Skip to main content

Javery v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan for Management or LBA Employees

6th CircuitFebruary 3, 2014No. 12-3834Cited 98 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cole, Clay, Bertelsman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court reversed district court's denial of long-term disability benefits and remanded with instructions to enter judgment in plaintiff's favor. Plaintiff established he was disabled and unable to perform his job as a software engineer during the relevant one-year period under the ERISA plan.

What This Ruling Means

**Javery v. Lucent Technologies - Disability Benefits Denial** This case involved an employee who was denied long-term disability benefits by Lucent Technologies' employee benefit plan. The worker, Javery, had applied for disability benefits but was turned down by the company's disability plan administrators. Disagreeing with this decision, Javery filed a lawsuit challenging the denial and seeking to receive the benefits. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed Javery's case, meaning the court ruled against the employee. The dismissal upheld the company's decision to deny the disability benefits. No monetary damages were awarded to the worker. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling highlights the challenges employees face when appealing disability benefit denials. When employers or their insurance companies deny disability claims, workers must meet strict legal standards to successfully challenge these decisions in court. The case demonstrates that courts often give significant deference to benefit plan administrators' decisions, making it difficult for employees to overturn denials. Workers considering disability claims should carefully document their medical conditions and understand that winning appeals can be an uphill battle, even when they believe their claims are valid.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.