Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
Case Details
- Citation
- 7 F. Supp. 3d 88, 2013 WL 6672400, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177951
- Judge(s)
- Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Civil
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- District of Columbia
- Circuit
- D.C. Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Court granted defendant's motion to dismiss, finding that the contraceptive coverage mandate accommodation does not impose a substantial burden on plaintiffs' religious exercise rights because the issuer's independent provision of coverage is a third-party act, not an act compelled of plaintiffs themselves.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.