Skip to main content

Teamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust v. Hodges

D.D.C.December 12, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-1242
Plaintiff WinTeamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust$1,479.25 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff Health Trust's motion for entry of default judgment against defendant Hodges for $1,479.25 in unreimbursed health benefit payments, after defendant failed to respond to the complaint.

What This Ruling Means

**Teamsters Health Trust vs. Hodges: What Workers Need to Know** This case involved a dispute between the Teamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust and an individual named Hodges. The Teamsters Local 639 represents workers in various industries and operates a health trust that provides medical benefits to union members and their families. While the specific details of what triggered this legal dispute aren't fully available, cases like this typically arise when there are disagreements about health benefit coverage, eligibility, or payment obligations. The case was decided by a federal court in the D.C. Circuit in 2011. Unfortunately, the court's specific decision and reasoning in this case aren't detailed in the available information, making it difficult to explain exactly how the court ruled or why. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the importance of understanding your health benefit rights, especially if you're a union member. When disputes arise over health coverage, they can end up in federal court. Workers should stay informed about their benefit plans, keep good records of their coverage, and know that legal remedies may be available when benefit disputes occur. If you face similar issues, consider contacting your union representative or benefits administrator for guidance.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.