Skip to main content

Teamsters Local 639 Employers Health Trust v. Hileman

D.D.C.October 23, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0833Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted the motion to dismiss against both Robert and Gary Hileman in their individual capacities, finding lack of personal jurisdiction over Gary Hileman and failure to state a claim against both defendants, who can be sued only in the corporate name, not individually.

What This Ruling Means

# Teamsters Local 639 Employers Health Trust v. Hileman **What Happened** The Teamsters Local 639 Employers Health Trust brought a legal case against Hileman in 2013. The health trust manages benefits for union workers and their families. The specific details of their dispute with Hileman were not publicly disclosed in the available court records. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case, meaning it rejected the health trust's claims. No damages were awarded to either party. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case illustrates that workers' benefits disputes can end in dismissal if claims don't meet legal requirements. For union members covered by the Teamsters health trust, this ruling means their claims against employers or others must be carefully constructed to succeed in court. Workers depending on health benefits should ensure they understand their coverage terms and keep detailed records of any disputes, as dismissed cases leave workers without compensation or resolution.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.