Skip to main content

Price v. Union Local 25

D.D.C.June 1, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1865
Defendant WinUNITE HERE Local 25
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge John D. Bates
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss, holding that individual union officers cannot be held liable for damages in duty of fair representation claims under Section 301(b) of the Labor Management Relations Act; only the union itself can be liable.

What This Ruling Means

**Price v. Union Local 25: Court Limits Who Workers Can Sue Over Union Representation** This case involved a worker who sued both UNITE HERE Local 25 union and individual union officers, claiming the union failed to properly represent them. The worker alleged the union did not adequately handle their workplace issue, which is called a "duty of fair representation" claim. The court sided with the defendants and dismissed the case. The judge ruled that under federal labor law, workers can only sue the union as an organization when claiming poor representation – they cannot sue individual union officers personally for damages. Only the union itself can be held financially responsible for failing to properly represent its members. **What this means for workers:** If you believe your union has done a poor job representing you in a workplace dispute, you can still file a lawsuit – but only against the union organization itself. You cannot seek money damages from individual union leaders, officers, or representatives personally. This ruling clarifies that union officers have some legal protection from personal liability when performing their duties, even if workers disagree with how they handled representation. Workers must focus their legal claims on the union as an institution rather than targeting specific people within the union leadership.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.