Skip to main content

Sherry Greene v. Heartland Employment Services

WVAApril 24, 2014No. 12-1046
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

The West Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the Board of Review's decision, which partially reversed the Office of Judges' order. While the employer was required to authorize a one-time change of physician to Dr. Kominsky, the court upheld the denial of the referral to Dr. Prud'homme because the bilateral forearm pain was not part of the compensable right elbow sprain/strain injury.

What This Ruling Means

**Greene v. Heartland Employment Services: Worker's Compensation Doctor Request** Sherry Greene suffered a right elbow injury at work while employed by Heartland Employment Services. She filed for workers' compensation benefits and later requested to see specific doctors for her treatment. Greene wanted to switch to Dr. Kominsky and also see Dr. Prud'homme for bilateral forearm pain she was experiencing. The West Virginia Supreme Court ruled partially in Greene's favor. The court said she could make a one-time change to see Dr. Kominsky for her elbow injury. However, the court denied her request to see Dr. Prud'homme because her bilateral forearm pain was not considered part of her original compensable right elbow injury. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that injured workers have some rights to choose their doctors under workers' compensation, but there are limits. Workers can typically request a one-time physician change for their covered injury. However, workers' compensation will only cover treatment for injuries that are directly related to the original workplace injury. If you develop new symptoms or pain in different areas, the insurance company may argue these aren't covered under your original claim, potentially requiring separate documentation or claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Sherry Greene v. Heartland Employment Services from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.