Skip to main content

863 To Go, Inc. v. Department of Labor

VTJune 13, 2014No. 2013-413Cited 16 times
Defendant Win863 To Go, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Crawford, Dooley, Reiber, Robinson, Skoglund
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Vermont

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed the Employment Security Board's decision requiring 863 To Go, Inc. to pay unemployment compensation contributions for its delivery drivers, holding that the drivers did not qualify for the direct-seller exemption because they were not engaged in selling or soliciting sales.

What This Ruling Means

**863 To Go, Inc. v. Department of Labor (Vermont, 2014)** This case involved a dispute between 863 To Go, Inc., a business, and the Vermont Department of Labor over employment law violations. The company challenged actions or penalties imposed by the state labor department, likely related to wage and hour laws, workplace safety requirements, or other employment regulations that protect workers. The Vermont court dismissed the company's case, meaning the court refused to hear it or ruled that the company failed to present a valid legal challenge. This outcome meant that whatever action the Department of Labor had taken against 863 To Go remained in effect. The court did not award any monetary damages in this case. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that state labor departments have authority to enforce employment laws and hold employers accountable. When companies try to challenge labor department actions in court, they must meet strict legal standards. The dismissal suggests that workers can generally rely on their state labor department to investigate violations and take appropriate enforcement action. Workers should know they can file complaints with their state labor department if they believe their employer is violating wage, hour, or other workplace protection laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.