Skip to main content

666 Drug, Inc. v. Trustee of 1199 Seiu Health Care Employees Pension Fund

2nd CircuitJuly 1, 2014No. 13-3280-cvCited 4 times
Defendant Win666 Drug, Inc.$846,613 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cabranes, Carney, Droney
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment upholding an arbitration award requiring 666 Drug, Inc. to pay $846,613 in withdrawal liability to the pension fund, rejecting the employer's arguments that withdrawal occurred in 1999 and that the fund breached fiduciary duties.

What This Ruling Means

**Drug Company Must Pay Workers' Pension Fund $846,613** This case involved a dispute between 666 Drug, Inc. and a pension fund that provides retirement benefits to healthcare workers represented by the 1199 SEIU union. When employers stop participating in multi-employer pension plans, they typically must pay "withdrawal liability" - money to help cover the pension benefits already promised to workers. 666 Drug, Inc. argued it didn't owe this money to the pension fund. The company claimed it had actually withdrawn from the pension plan years earlier in 1999, and also accused the pension fund managers of not properly handling their responsibilities. The court disagreed with the company on both points. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's decision that required 666 Drug, Inc. to pay $846,613 to the workers' pension fund. **What this means for workers:** This ruling protects workers' retirement security by ensuring that when companies leave pension plans, they can't simply walk away without paying their fair share. It reinforces that employers have financial obligations to pension funds that benefit workers, even when business relationships end. This helps preserve retirement benefits that workers have earned through their employment.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.