Skip to main content

Teamsters Local Union No. 455 v. National Labor Relations Board

10th CircuitAugust 27, 2014No. 12-9519Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gorsuch, Ebel, O'Brien
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Tenth Circuit denied the Teamsters union's petition for review of an NLRB order, upholding the Board's decision that while Harborlite's threat to hire permanent replacement workers violated the NLRA, the lockout itself was lawful and no backpay was warranted because the threat was short-lived and didn't materially affect negotiations.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Representation Dispute Gets Mixed Court Ruling** This case involved a dispute between Teamsters Local Union No. 455 and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) over union representation issues and claims of unfair labor practices. The union challenged some decisions made by the NLRB, which is the federal agency that oversees labor relations and protects workers' rights to organize. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals reached a split decision in August 2014. The court agreed with the NLRB on some issues but disagreed on others, partially affirming and partially reversing the agency's original ruling. The court examined whether certain actions constituted unfair labor practices and reviewed disputes about union representation rights. **What This Means for Workers:** This mixed ruling shows that even federal labor agencies don't always get their decisions right the first time. When unions challenge NLRB rulings in court, workers can sometimes get better outcomes. The case demonstrates the importance of the appeals process in labor disputes and reminds workers that they have multiple levels of protection when dealing with unfair labor practices. It also highlights that union representation disputes can be complex, requiring careful legal review to ensure workers' rights are properly protected.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.