Skip to main content

Beriont v. GTE Laboratories, Inc.

Federal CircuitFebruary 4, 2015No. 2014-1424
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Lourie, O'Malley, Per Curiam, Reyna
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment for GTE, holding that Beriont failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he was the sole inventor of the patent, and that the named co-inventor Bellows properly assigned his rights to GTE.

What This Ruling Means

**Beriont v. GTE Laboratories, Inc.: Employment Dispute** This case involved an employment law dispute between an employee named Beriont and GTE Laboratories, Inc., which was heard by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in February 2015. However, the available court records do not provide sufficient details about what specific employment issues were at the center of this dispute or what workplace problems led to the lawsuit. Unfortunately, the court's final decision and reasoning cannot be determined from the limited information available in the case record. No damages were reported, and the ultimate outcome remains unclear from the documentation provided. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific details or outcome of this case, workers cannot draw concrete lessons about their rights or protections. This situation highlights an important point for employees: court records don't always provide complete information about employment disputes, and cases can have various outcomes that may not be immediately apparent from basic filing information. Workers facing employment issues should seek current legal guidance rather than relying on incomplete case summaries when making decisions about their workplace rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.