Skip to main content

Carolyn Barnes v. University Federal Credit Union and Government Employees Insurance Company/GEICO Insurance

Tex. App.—3rd Dist.April 18, 2013No. 03-10-00147-CV
Mixed ResultUniversity Federal Credit Union$11,022.33 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWrongful Termination

Outcome

The jury found against Barnes on her breach of contract and DTPA claims but awarded her $1,049.96 in damages and $35,000 in attorneys' fees on her fair debt collection claim against UFCU. UFCU was awarded $11,022.33 in damages and $75,000 in attorneys' fees on its counterclaim. The appellate court affirmed the trial judgment with a condition to reduce attorneys' fees on appeal to $15,000.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information available, this case involved Carolyn Barnes, who brought an employment-related legal dispute against her employer, University Federal Credit Union, and GEICO Insurance. The case was heard by the Texas Court of Appeals in April 2013. Unfortunately, the specific details of what happened in Barnes' workplace dispute are not clear from the available information. The case appears to involve some type of employment law violation or workplace issue that Barnes experienced while working at the credit union, with GEICO Insurance also named as a defendant, possibly related to insurance matters. The court's final decision and reasoning are not available in the provided information, making it impossible to determine how the case was resolved or whether Barnes was successful in her claims. **What this means for workers:** While the specific outcome is unknown, this case serves as a reminder that employees have legal options when they face workplace problems. Workers can file lawsuits against their employers for various employment law violations, and these cases can work their way up through the court system, including appeals courts. The involvement of an insurance company also suggests that workplace disputes can sometimes involve multiple parties beyond just the employee and employer.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Carolyn Barnes v. University Federal Credit Union and Government Employees Insurance Company/GEICO Insurance from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.