Skip to main content

Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitSeptember 18, 2015No. 14-1047, 14-1081Cited 12 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Garland, Griffith, Kavanaugh
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The D.C. Circuit denied the employer's petition for review and enforced the NLRB's order finding that the employer unlawfully withdrew recognition from the union because employee statements did not demonstrate loss of majority support for union representation.

What This Ruling Means

**Pacific Coast Supply v. National Labor Relations Board** This case involved Pacific Coast Supply, LLC challenging a ruling by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) that found the company had committed unfair labor practices against its workers. The company was accused of retaliating against employees who engaged in activities protected under federal labor law, such as organizing or discussing workplace conditions. Pacific Coast Supply disagreed with the NLRB's findings and the penalties it imposed, so the company appealed the decision to federal court. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB and upheld its original ruling against Pacific Coast Supply. The court rejected the company's challenge and confirmed that the unfair labor practice findings were correct. The court also upheld the NLRB's remedial orders, which likely required the company to take specific actions to fix the violations. This decision matters for workers because it reinforces that employers cannot retaliate against employees for exercising their rights under federal labor law. When workers organize, discuss wages and working conditions, or engage in other protected activities, their employers are legally prohibited from punishing them. The ruling demonstrates that courts will support workers' rights when companies try to challenge these protections.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.