Skip to main content

Sec US Dept Labor v. Gilley

6th CircuitMay 7, 2002No. 00-6413
Plaintiff WinCentury Health Services, Inc.$2,100,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Secretary of Labor prevailed in obtaining a judgment against Century Health Services and the ESOP trustees for breach of fiduciary duty. The defendants were held jointly and severally liable to restore approximately $2.1 million in funds that were withdrawn from the ESOP and never replaced with equivalent assets.

What This Ruling Means

**Labor Department Wins $2.1 Million Case Against Healthcare Company** This case involved Century Health Services, Inc., a healthcare company that operated an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for its workers. An ESOP is a retirement benefit where employees own shares in their company. The U.S. Department of Labor sued the company and the people managing the ESOP, claiming they improperly took about $2.1 million out of the employee retirement fund and never put the money back or replaced it with anything of equal value. The federal appeals court ruled in favor of the Department of Labor in May 2002. The court found that Century Health Services and the ESOP managers violated their legal duty to protect employee retirement money. They were ordered to pay back the full $2.1 million to restore the workers' retirement fund. This ruling matters because it shows that companies and retirement plan managers cannot simply take money from employee retirement accounts without consequences. The law requires them to act in workers' best interests when managing these funds. When they fail to do so, courts will force them to pay the money back, protecting workers' retirement security.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.