Skip to main content

James Price v. Bd. of Trs. of the Ind. Laborer's Pension Fund

6th CircuitFebruary 15, 2013No. 11-4126Cited 9 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sutton, McKeague, Jonker
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's decision and granted judgment in favor of the Board of Trustees, holding that the Board's amendment to the pension plan terminating Price's occupational disability benefits was not arbitrary and capricious because the plan language reasonably permitted retroactive amendment of welfare benefits.

What This Ruling Means

**Price v. Board of Trustees of the Industrial Laborer's Pension Fund (2013)** **What Happened:** James Price had a dispute with the Board of Trustees of the Industrial Laborer's Pension Fund regarding his employment rights. The specific details of his complaint are not fully detailed in the available information, but the case involved employment law issues related to the pension fund's management. **What the Court Decided:** The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed Price's case in February 2013. This means the court threw out his lawsuit without awarding him any money or other remedies. The dismissal indicates that either Price failed to prove his case, didn't follow proper legal procedures, or the court found his claims lacked merit under the law. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that employment disputes involving pension funds can be complex and challenging to win in court. Workers should understand that simply having a disagreement with pension fund trustees doesn't guarantee a successful lawsuit. It's important for employees to carefully document any issues and understand their rights before pursuing legal action. Workers dealing with pension-related employment problems should consider seeking advice from employment attorneys or union representatives to better understand their options and the strength of potential claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.