Skip to main content

Carol Liss v. Fidelity Employer Services Co.

6th CircuitFebruary 26, 2013No. 11-2124Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Moore, Cole, Rose
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Sixth Circuit remanded the case to the district court with instructions to determine whether the Summary Plan Description was properly furnished to the plan participant, as this issue was unclear in the record and is dispositive to whether a constructive trust should be imposed.

What This Ruling Means

# Carol Liss v. Fidelity Employer Services Co. ## What Happened Carol Liss had a dispute with her employer Ford Motor Company regarding her retirement benefits. The case involved whether Fidelity, the company managing her retirement plan, properly provided her with important plan documents. These documents, called a Summary Plan Description, explain how the retirement plan works and what benefits employees are entitled to receive. Liss claimed there was a breach of contract related to her benefits. ## What the Court Decided The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals did not make a final ruling. Instead, it sent the case back to the lower court with specific instructions. The appeals court said the lower court needed to determine whether Fidelity actually gave Liss the required Summary Plan Description. This determination was crucial because it would decide whether the court should force Fidelity to hold the disputed benefits in trust for Liss. ## Why This Matters This case reminds workers that companies must properly give them documents explaining their retirement benefits. If employers or plan administrators fail to provide these documents, workers may have legal remedies. Getting clear information about your benefits is a fundamental right that courts take seriously.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.