Skip to main content

Laborers' Pension v. Pavement Maintenance

7th CircuitAugust 29, 2008No. 06-1955
Plaintiff WinPavement Maintenance, Inc.$242,647.75 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wood
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's post-judgment garnishment order requiring MAT Leasing to pay $242,647.75 to satisfy the Laborers' Funds' judgment against Pavement Maintenance, Inc.

What This Ruling Means

**The Dispute** This case involved Pavement Maintenance, Inc., a construction company that failed to pay required contributions to worker pension and benefit funds. The Laborers' Pension Fund sued the company for wage theft, claiming the employer owed money that should have been paid into workers' retirement and benefit accounts. **The Court's Decision** The court ruled in favor of the workers' pension fund and ordered Pavement Maintenance to pay $242,647.75 in damages. When the company failed to pay this judgment, the court allowed the pension fund to collect the money directly from MAT Leasing, a company connected to Pavement Maintenance. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this decision, confirming that the pension fund could garnish funds from the related company to satisfy the debt. **What This Means for Workers** This ruling is significant because it shows courts will enforce pension and benefit payments that employers owe to workers. Even when companies try to avoid paying by using related businesses, courts can reach those connected entities to collect what's owed. This protection helps ensure workers don't lose retirement benefits when employers attempt to dodge their legal obligations to contribute to pension funds.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.