Skip to main content

Gregory Adamson v. Los Angeles County

9th CircuitDecember 29, 2009No. 08-55712
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Goodwin, Wallace, Clifton
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of most claims but vacated the dismissal of certain claims (1-4, 9-10) with prejudice and remanded for dismissal without prejudice under the Heck doctrine, as the claims implied invalidity of the plaintiff's conviction without allegation of invalidation.

What This Ruling Means

**Adamson v. Los Angeles County: Court Rules on Employee Claims After Criminal Conviction** Gregory Adamson, a Los Angeles County employee, sued his employer after apparently facing workplace issues that led to various legal claims. The case involved multiple employment-related complaints, but the situation was complicated because Adamson had also been criminally convicted of something related to his work. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals made a mixed ruling. They agreed with a lower court's decision to dismiss most of Adamson's claims against the county. However, they found problems with how some specific claims were handled. The court said certain claims should be dismissed "without prejudice" instead of "with prejudice" under something called the Heck doctrine. This legal rule prevents employees from making claims that would essentially challenge their criminal conviction unless they can prove that conviction was overturned or invalidated. **What this means for workers:** If you face criminal charges related to your job and want to sue your employer, timing matters greatly. You may need to resolve your criminal case first or prove your conviction was wrong before pursuing certain employment claims. The type of dismissal also matters—"without prejudice" means you might be able to refile later under the right circumstances.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.