Skip to main content

EEOC v. Southwestern Bell Telephone

8th CircuitDecember 19, 2008No. 08-1096
Plaintiff WinSouthwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.$786,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationFailure to AccommodateWrongful Termination

Outcome

The EEOC prevailed at trial. A jury found AT&T violated Title VII by failing to reasonably accommodate the religious beliefs of two Jehovah's Witness employees and terminating them for refusing to work on a day required for religious convention attendance. The jury awarded $396,000 to Gonzalez and $390,000 to Owen in damages, and the court ordered reinstatement and front pay.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules for Jehovah's Witness Employees Fired for Religious Observance** This case involved two Jehovah's Witness employees at Southwestern Bell Telephone (now AT&T) who were fired after refusing to work on a day when they needed to attend a required religious convention. The employees, Gonzalez and Owen, asked their employer to accommodate their religious beliefs by allowing them time off for this important religious obligation. The company refused their request and terminated both workers when they chose to attend the convention instead of reporting to work. The court sided with the employees, ruling that AT&T violated federal civil rights law by failing to reasonably accommodate their workers' religious beliefs and wrongfully firing them. A jury awarded substantial damages: $396,000 to Gonzalez and $390,000 to Owen, totaling $786,000. The court also ordered the company to reinstate both employees and provide additional compensation for lost wages. This ruling matters because it reinforces that employers must make reasonable efforts to accommodate workers' sincere religious practices, including time off for religious observances. Workers cannot be fired simply for requesting religious accommodations, and companies that fail to engage in good-faith discussions about such requests face significant financial penalties.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.