Skip to main content

Weaver v. State Employees' Retirement Board

Pa. Commw. Ct.October 23, 2015No. 124 C.D. 2015Cited 8 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McGinley, Simpson, McCullough
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the State Employees' Retirement Board's denial of Weaver's request for service credit during an unpaid disciplinary suspension, holding that the Retirement Code requires contributions or salary deductions to establish credited service, which were absent during the suspension period.

What This Ruling Means

**Weaver v. State Employees' Retirement Board - Plain English Summary** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Weaver and Pennsylvania's State Employees' Retirement Board. While the specific details of what triggered the disagreement aren't provided in the available information, the case dealt with employment-related issues between Weaver and this state agency that manages retirement benefits for government workers. The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court dismissed Weaver's case in October 2015. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money damages to Weaver. When a court dismisses a case, it typically means either the employee didn't have valid legal grounds for their complaint, failed to follow proper procedures, or couldn't prove their claims. For workers, this case serves as a reminder that employment disputes with government agencies can be challenging to win in court. State retirement boards have specific rules and procedures that must be followed, and employees need strong legal grounds to successfully challenge their decisions. Workers considering similar action should ensure they understand the proper procedures and have solid evidence to support their claims before filing a lawsuit against a government employer or retirement system.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.