Skip to main content

Spurlino Materials, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitNovember 13, 2015No. 12-1034, 12-1123Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Garland, Williams, Randolph
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Ohio

Related Laws

Claim Types

RetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The NLRB's order requiring Spurlino Materials to reinstate striking employees and make them whole was enforced. The court denied the employer's petition for review and granted the Board's cross-application for enforcement, finding the strike was a protected unfair labor practice strike and the employer violated the NLRA by refusing reinstatement.

What This Ruling Means

**Spurlino Materials, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board** This case involved a dispute between Spurlino Materials and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) over alleged unfair labor practices. The NLRB had previously found that Spurlino Materials violated federal labor law by retaliating against employees for engaging in protected workplace activities. These activities likely included actions like organizing, discussing working conditions, or other rights protected under the National Labor Relations Act. Spurlino Materials challenged the NLRB's decision in federal court, arguing that the labor board was wrong in its findings. However, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB and upheld the original unfair labor practice ruling against the company. **What This Means for Workers:** This decision reinforces important protections for employees in the workplace. It confirms that employers cannot retaliate against workers who exercise their rights to organize, discuss working conditions, or engage in other protected activities under federal labor law. When companies try to challenge these protections in court, this ruling shows that federal courts will support workers' rights when employers are found to have violated labor laws. Workers can feel more confident that retaliation for protected activities will have legal consequences for employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.