Skip to main content

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 132 Health & Welfare Fund v. L.A. Pipeline Construction Co.

WVAMay 18, 2016No. 15-0898Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Justice
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Decision by West Virginia court regarding union fund obligations

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

This is a union health and welfare fund case against L.A. Pipeline Construction Co. involving contractual obligations and employee benefit contributions. The court determined liability for unpaid benefits contributions owed to the union fund.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Health Fund Wins Case Against Pipeline Company Over Unpaid Benefits** This case involved a dispute between a union health and welfare fund and L.A. Pipeline Construction Company over unpaid employee benefit contributions. The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health & Welfare Fund sued the construction company, claiming the employer failed to make required payments into the union's health and welfare fund as promised in their contract. The court ruled in favor of the union fund, finding that L.A. Pipeline Construction Company was indeed liable for the unpaid benefit contributions they owed. The company had contractual obligations to contribute to the fund that provides health and welfare benefits to union workers, and the court determined they failed to meet these requirements. This decision matters for workers because it reinforces that employers must follow through on their promises to fund employee benefits. When companies agree to contribute to union health and welfare funds as part of collective bargaining agreements, they cannot simply skip these payments. The ruling helps protect workers' access to health benefits by ensuring employers are held accountable for their contractual obligations to fund these important programs.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.