Skip to main content

Preville v. Pepsico Hourly Employees Retirement Plan

2nd CircuitMay 20, 2016No. 15-2553Cited 5 times
Defendant WinPepsiCo
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cabranes, Straub, Lohier
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of the PepsiCo Hourly Employees Retirement Plan, upholding the plan administrator's denial of Preville's pension benefits application based on his failure to make a timely election within six months of becoming eligible for long-term disability benefits.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** A PepsiCo employee named Preville had a dispute with the company's retirement plan for hourly workers. The case involved disagreements over how the retirement plan was managed or administered under federal law (ERISA), which governs workplace retirement and benefit plans. The specific details of what Preville was challenging about the plan aren't clear from the available information. **What the court decided:** The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Preville's case, meaning the court threw out the lawsuit without ruling in the employee's favor. No damages were awarded, and the employee did not win any relief from the court. **Why this matters for workers:** This case shows how challenging it can be for employees to successfully challenge their employer's retirement plans in court, even when they believe something is wrong with how the plan is run. Workers should understand that ERISA cases require strong evidence and proper legal procedures. If you have concerns about your workplace retirement plan, it's important to carefully document any issues and understand that courts set a high bar for these types of challenges. The dismissal suggests employees need solid grounds and proper legal support when disputing retirement plan decisions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.