Town of Southington v. Coml. Union Ins., No. Cv 95 0565691 S (Jul. 18, 2001)
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- RITTENBAND, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- remanded
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The trial court initially awarded the Town $175,000 against Commercial Union on a subdivision bond claim. After reversal and Supreme Court review, the case was remanded to determine factual findings on whether the Town was a successor developer and thus precluded from calling the bond. On remand, the court found the Town was a successor developer but was not precluded from calling the bond because it had called the bond before purchasing the property.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.