Skip to main content

First Union National Bank v. Grills, No. Cv97-543720 (Aug. 16, 2001)

Conn. Super. Ct.August 16, 2001No. No. CV97-543720
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
CORRADINO, JUDGE.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted EMC Mortgage Corporation's motion for summary judgment on the Grills' counterclaims and setoffs, ruling that the Grills cannot assert counterclaims against EMC for alleged wrongful actions taken by First Union prior to the loan assignment, though they retain the right to assert defenses to the foreclosure action and pursue claims against First Union separately.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a dispute between homeowners (the Grills family) and two financial companies - First Union National Bank and EMC Mortgage Corporation. The Grills had a mortgage with First Union Bank, but the loan was later transferred to EMC Mortgage. When EMC tried to foreclose on their home, the Grills fought back by claiming that First Union had wrongfully handled their loan before it was transferred to EMC. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of EMC Mortgage Corporation. The judge decided that the Grills could not sue EMC for problems that happened when First Union still owned their loan. However, the court said the Grills could still defend against the foreclosure and could pursue a separate lawsuit against First Union for any wrongdoing. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that when financial companies transfer loans or contracts, the new company may not be responsible for the previous company's mistakes. For workers facing foreclosure or contract disputes, this means you need to identify which company was responsible for specific actions and sue the right party. It's important to understand that transferred debts or contracts can limit your legal options against the new owner.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.