Skip to main content

Harvey Eng. And Mfg. Corp. v. Nlrb

8th CircuitSeptember 21, 1979No. 79-1180
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit enforced the NLRB's decision, upholding the Board's ruling in the labor dispute between Harvey Engineering and Manufacturing Corp. and the NLRB.

What This Ruling Means

**Harvey Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. v. NLRB (1979)** This case involved a dispute between Harvey Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) over workplace rights protected under federal labor law. The company disagreed with a ruling made by the NLRB and appealed the decision to the federal appeals court, claiming the labor board had made errors in its judgment. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB and enforced the labor board's original decision. The court rejected Harvey Engineering's appeal, meaning the company had to comply with whatever the NLRB had originally ordered them to do regarding worker rights. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that courts will back up the NLRB when employers try to challenge labor board decisions. The NLRB is the federal agency responsible for protecting workers' rights to organize, join unions, and engage in other workplace activities. When courts enforce NLRB rulings like this, it strengthens the agency's authority to protect workers and sends a message to employers that they cannot easily overturn labor board decisions that favor workers' rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.