Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. Matros Automated Electrical Construction Corp.

2nd CircuitFebruary 11, 2010No. 09-2249-ag(L), 09-2591-ag(XAP), 09-2885-ag(XAP)Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Calabresi, Katzmann, Chin
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The Second Circuit enforced the NLRB's Decision and Order finding that Matros committed unfair labor practices under §§ 8(a)(3) and 8(a)(1) of the NLRA by discharging an employee for union activities and denying wage increases to union-active employees.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Rules Against Matros for Punishing Union Activity **What Happened** Matros Automated Electrical Construction Corp. fired an employee and denied wage increases to workers who were involved in union activities. The company appeared to have taken these actions specifically because the employees were trying to organize or support a union. **What the Court Decided** A federal appeals court agreed with the National Labor Relations Board that Matros broke labor laws. The court enforced an order requiring the company to stop this unfair behavior. The ruling confirmed that Matros unlawfully discharged the employee and discriminated against union-active workers by withholding raises. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case reinforces that workers have legal protection when they try to organize unions or support union activities. Employers cannot fire workers or punish them financially for these activities. Even if a company disagrees with unionization, the law prohibits retaliation. This ruling strengthens workers' rights to pursue collective bargaining without fear of losing their jobs or income.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.