Skip to main content

Quicken Loans, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitJuly 29, 2016No. 14-1231; Consolidated with 14-1265Cited 9 times
Defendant WinQuicken Loans, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Srinivasan, Millett, Wilkins
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Quicken Loans' petition for review and enforced the National Labor Relations Board's order requiring the company to rescind or modify workplace rules (Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Rules) that violated Section 7 rights of the National Labor Relations Act by chilling employees' ability to discuss wages, benefits, and working conditions.

What This Ruling Means

**What the Case Was About** Quicken Loans, a mortgage company, had workplace rules that prevented employees from discussing confidential company information and from making negative comments about the company. Workers complained that these rules were too broad and stopped them from talking freely about their pay, benefits, and working conditions with coworkers. The National Labor Relations Board agreed with the workers and ordered Quicken Loans to change these rules. The company disagreed and asked a federal appeals court to overturn that decision. **What the Court Decided** The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the workers and the National Labor Relations Board. The court denied Quicken Loans' challenge and enforced the order requiring the company to remove or modify its confidentiality and non-disparagement rules. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers' rights to discuss their workplace experiences with each other. Employers cannot use overly broad confidentiality or "don't criticize the company" rules to prevent employees from talking about wages, benefits, or working conditions. Workers have the legal right to share information about their jobs, even if it makes their employer uncomfortable.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.