Skip to main content

Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Glenn's Building Services, Inc.

D.D.C.August 3, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1942
Plaintiff WinGlenn's Building Services, Inc.$217,572.36 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge John D. Bates
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendant Glenn's Building Services for ERISA withdrawal liability in the amount of $209,003.86 plus interest, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees of $8,568.50.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved Glenn's Building Services, a company that was part of a union pension plan managed by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). When employers participate in these multi-employer pension plans, they make regular contributions to fund retirement benefits for their workers. Glenn's Building Services apparently stopped participating in the plan, which triggered what's called "withdrawal liability" - essentially a bill for the company's share of unfunded pension obligations they're leaving behind. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of the union pension fund because Glenn's Building Services failed to respond to the lawsuit (called a "default judgment"). The company was ordered to pay $217,572, which included $209,003 in withdrawal liability, plus interest, penalties, and $8,568 in legal fees. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers' pension benefits by ensuring employers can't simply walk away from their pension obligations without consequences. When companies participate in union pension plans, they become legally responsible for helping fund those benefits. This decision reinforces that employers must pay what they owe, helping preserve retirement security for workers even when companies leave the plan.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.