Skip to main content

T. Flagg v. Int'l Union, Security, Police, Fire Professionals of America, Local 506

Pa. Commw. Ct.August 23, 2016No. 641 M.D. 2011Cited 28 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brobson, McCullough, Leadbetter
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
Circuit
3rd Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractRetaliation

Outcome

The court granted Kelly's motion for summary relief and dismissed Counts III and IV of Flagg's petition. Count III (§1983 First Amendment claim against Kelly) was dismissed because Kelly, as a state employee, is not a 'person' under §1983 and the Eleventh Amendment shields him from liability. Count IV (tortious interference claim) was dismissed based on Kelly's statutory immunity as an employee.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Member's Lawsuit Against Local Union Dismissed** In this case, T. Flagg filed a lawsuit against their local union, the International Union, Security, Police, Fire Professionals of America, Local 506. While the court record doesn't provide specific details about the nature of the dispute, it appears to involve an employment-related disagreement between Flagg and the union that represents security, police, and fire professionals. The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court dismissed Flagg's case in August 2016. A dismissal means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money or other remedies to the person who filed it. No damages were reported, indicating Flagg received no compensation. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights that union members can face challenges when bringing legal claims against their own unions. When courts dismiss employment cases, it often means the legal claims didn't meet the required standards or lacked sufficient evidence. For workers represented by unions, this serves as a reminder that disputes with union leadership can be difficult to resolve through the court system. Workers should understand that internal union procedures or labor relations processes might be more appropriate channels for addressing concerns with their union representatives before considering litigation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.