Skip to main content

Jerry McCOTTRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee

7th CircuitJanuary 30, 1984No. 83-1351Cited 89 times
Defendant WinEqual Employment Opportunity Commission
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cummings, Eschbach, Flaum
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The Seventh Circuit affirmed dismissal of plaintiff's pro se suit against the EEOC challenging its no-reasonable-cause determination, holding Title VII provides no cause of action against the EEOC for its handling of a charge.

What This Ruling Means

**McCottrell v. EEOC: Court Dismisses Challenge to Agency Procedures** Jerry McCottrell filed a lawsuit challenging the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) over their procedures or decisions in handling his employment discrimination case. McCottrell was unhappy with how the EEOC processed his complaint and took his dispute to federal court, asking the judges to overturn the agency's actions. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed McCottrell's case in January 1984. The court ruled against him, meaning his challenge to the EEOC's procedures was unsuccessful. No monetary damages were awarded because the case was thrown out entirely. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights an important limitation for workers dealing with employment discrimination. When you file a discrimination complaint with the EEOC, there are limited ways to challenge how the agency handles your case. Courts generally give the EEOC significant discretion in their procedures and decision-making process. For workers, this means it's crucial to work cooperatively with the EEOC during their investigation process, as successfully challenging their procedures in court can be very difficult. Focus on providing thorough documentation and evidence to support your discrimination claim rather than trying to control the agency's process.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.