Skip to main content

Volis v. Housing Authority of Los Angeles Employees

9th CircuitNovember 4, 2016No. 14-55955Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Leavy, Silverman, Graber
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Volis' federal ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims for failure to state plausible claims, and state law tort claims for failure to comply with the California Government Claims Act.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Volis, an employee of the Housing Authority of Los Angeles, sued their employer claiming disability discrimination, retaliation, and failure to provide reasonable accommodations. Volis also brought claims under federal disability laws (the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act) and state tort laws. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled against Volis and dismissed all claims. The federal disability claims were thrown out because the court found Volis failed to provide enough factual details to support plausible legal claims. The state law claims were dismissed because Volis didn't follow California's Government Claims Act, which requires specific procedures when suing government agencies. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights two important requirements for workers suing employers. First, when filing disability discrimination claims, employees must provide specific, detailed facts showing how they were discriminated against or denied accommodations - vague allegations won't survive in court. Second, workers suing government employers in California must strictly follow the Government Claims Act procedures, which typically require filing administrative claims before going to court. Missing these procedural steps can result in losing an otherwise valid case entirely.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.