Skip to main content

Wilkins Township v. Wage Policy Committee of the Wilkins Township Police Department

Pa. Commw. Ct.May 18, 2017No. Wilkins Twp. v. The Wage Policy Committee of the Wilkins Twp. PD - 1219 C.D. 2016Cited 4 times
Plaintiff WinWilkins Township$25,020 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brobson, McCullough, Wojcik
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the trial court's confirmation of a supplemental arbitration award requiring Wilkins Township to compensate police officer Jon Sherman $25,020 in lost wages for denying him off-duty employment at a bar, finding the arbitrator had jurisdiction to award damages and the Township's procedural due process rights were not violated.

What This Ruling Means

**Police Officer Wins $25,020 for Denied Off-Duty Work** This case involved a dispute between Wilkins Township and police officer Jon Sherman over off-duty employment. Sherman wanted to work security at a bar during his time off, but the township denied his request. Sherman argued this denial violated his contract rights, so the matter went to arbitration—a process where a neutral third party resolves workplace disputes. The arbitrator ruled in Sherman's favor and awarded him $25,020 in lost wages. When Wilkins Township challenged this decision in court, both the trial court and Pennsylvania's Commonwealth Court sided with Sherman. The courts found that the arbitrator had the authority to make this decision and that the township received fair treatment throughout the process. **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows that employment contracts can protect workers' rights to outside employment, even for government employees. If your contract includes provisions about off-duty work, employers may not be able to arbitrarily deny these opportunities. Workers also have access to arbitration as an effective way to resolve contract disputes, and courts will generally uphold arbitrators' decisions when they follow proper procedures.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.