Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. EYM King of Missouri, LLC

8th CircuitJune 21, 2017No. 16-3415Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gruender, Murphy, Kelly
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationDiscrimination

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit granted the NLRB's petition for enforcement of its order finding that EYM King violated the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to hire Terrance Wise based on his protected labor organizing activities. The court concluded that substantial evidence supported the Board's determination that the employer's stated reasons for non-hire were pretextual.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Rules Company Must Hire Worker Rejected for Union Activity ## What Happened Terrance Wise applied for a job at EYM King of Missouri, LLC, but the company refused to hire him. Wise had previously engaged in protected labor organizing activities—efforts to form or support a union. The company claimed it rejected him for other reasons, but investigators believed the real reason was his union involvement. ## What the Court Decided The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the National Labor Relations Board that the company violated federal labor law. The court found that the company's stated reasons for not hiring Wise were fake excuses covering up the true reason: his protected union activities. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling reinforces that companies cannot punish workers for trying to organize unions or engage in collective activities. Workers have legal protection to participate in union organizing without facing retaliation, including during the hiring process. If a company denies someone a job because of their union activities, they can be held accountable by the courts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.