Skip to main content

CALEDA L. WOODS VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

NJSUPERCTAPPDIVJune 23, 2017No. A-1865-15T1
Defendant WinBoard of Review, Department of Labor$21,041 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the Board of Review's decision requiring appellant to repay $21,041 in unemployment benefits she received while misrepresenting her employment status, along with fines and a one-year disqualification from benefits.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Must Repay Unemployment Benefits After Misrepresenting Employment Status** This case involved Caleda Woods, who received unemployment benefits while allegedly misrepresenting her employment situation to the state. The Department of Labor's Board of Review determined that Woods was not entitled to the benefits she had been receiving because she had provided false information about her work status when applying for or continuing to receive unemployment compensation. The New Jersey appeals court sided with the Board of Review and upheld their decision. The court ruled that Woods must repay $21,041 in unemployment benefits she had improperly received. Additionally, she faces financial penalties and is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits for one full year. This ruling serves as an important reminder for workers about the serious consequences of providing false information when applying for unemployment benefits. Workers must be completely honest about their employment status, work history, and job search activities when filing claims. Misrepresenting information can result in having to repay all benefits received, additional fines, and being banned from receiving future benefits. The state takes unemployment fraud seriously, and the financial and legal consequences can be severe and long-lasting.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.