Skip to main content

Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitAugust 1, 2017No. 15-1135 Consolidated with 15-1167Cited 35 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brown, Sentelle, Randolph
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the NLRB's unfair labor practice findings. While the court upheld some NLRB determinations, it reversed the finding that Fred Meyer violated the National Labor Relations Act by limiting union representative access and reversed the requirement to post notices, finding the union's conduct on October 15, 2009 did not constitute protected activity.

What This Ruling Means

**Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board** This case involved a dispute between grocery chain Fred Meyer and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) over whether the company violated workers' rights during union activities. The NLRB had previously ruled that Fred Meyer committed unfair labor practices by restricting union representatives' access to the workplace and had ordered the company to post notices about workers' rights. The Court of Appeals partially disagreed with the NLRB's findings. While the court upheld some of the labor board's decisions against Fred Meyer, it reversed two key rulings. The court found that Fred Meyer did not violate federal labor law when it limited union representatives' access to company property. The court also overturned the requirement for Fred Meyer to post notices, determining that the union's activities on October 15, 2009 were not legally protected conduct under the National Labor Relations Act. This mixed ruling matters for workers because it clarifies the boundaries of union activity in the workplace. While employees retain many organizing rights, this decision shows that not all union conduct receives legal protection, and employers may have more leeway to restrict outside union representatives' access to their property during labor disputes.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.