Skip to main content

Hershberger v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol

OHIOCTCLOctober 5, 2017No. 2017-00126-AD
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Reed
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Complaint dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; judgment granted to defendant

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court dismissed plaintiff's breach of contract complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, ruling that the collective bargaining unit member was required to pursue administrative remedies instead of court action.

Excerpt

Breach of contract-Plaintiff, a former employee of defendant, sought recovery for health insurance premium overpayments, retroactive pay, and a ratification bonus. Plaintiff was a member of a collective bargaining unit and was required to pursue administrative remedies. As the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint and granted judgment to defendant.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** A former Ohio State Highway Patrol employee sued his employer for breach of contract, claiming he was owed money for overpaid health insurance premiums, back pay, and a bonus payment. The employee believed the state had not honored its contractual obligations to him regarding these benefits and compensation. **What the Court Decided:** The court dismissed the case entirely, ruling it didn't have the authority to hear this dispute. The judge determined that because the employee was part of a union (collective bargaining unit), he was required to use the administrative process outlined in his union contract instead of going directly to court. The court sided with the Ohio State Highway Patrol. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling highlights an important limitation for unionized workers. If you're covered by a union contract and have disputes with your employer about pay, benefits, or contract terms, you typically cannot skip the union's grievance process and go straight to court. You must first exhaust the administrative remedies available through your union contract, such as filing grievances or going through arbitration. Only after completing these steps might you have the option to pursue court action.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.