Skip to main content

Fuller v. Anchor Pointe Marina

Ohio Ct. App.December 8, 2017No. L-17-1051Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pietrykowski
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Anchor Pointe Marina on plaintiffs' claims for boat damage and dock space loss, but reversed on the personal injury claim regarding the open and obvious defense, remanding for trial.

Excerpt

Out of court statement of a deceased office worker is not hearsay where it was an admission of a party opponent made by a servant of appellee during the course of her employment. Genuine issue of material fact exists whether appellee agreed to remove the drain plugs from appellants' boat where the office worker told appellants, "We'll take care of it," and "We got it winterized, shored, everything's taken care of." Premises liability claim must fail where appellant had actual knowledge of the hazard.

What This Ruling Means

# Fuller v. Anchor Pointe Marina: Plain English Summary ## What Happened A customer brought their boat to Anchor Pointe Marina for winter storage and maintenance. The marina's office worker told the customer that the staff would handle everything, including removing drain plugs. The boat was damaged, allegedly because the drain plugs weren't removed. The customer sued the marina for breach of contract and negligence, seeking damages for the boat damage and loss of dock space. ## What the Court Decided The appeals court sided with the marina on most claims. The court ruled that the marina wasn't responsible for the boat damage or the customer's loss of dock space. However, the court did allow one part of the case—a personal injury claim related to an unsafe condition at the dock—to proceed to trial. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that what employees say on the job can be legally binding for employers. When marina workers made promises to customers, those statements created legal obligations for the company. It also demonstrates that courts examine whether employers properly warned customers about hazards on their property.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.