Skip to main content

Caruthers v. Sec. Of Treasury

11th CircuitMarch 18, 1985No. 19-12277
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
3710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision, resulting in a victory for the Secretary of Treasury on the Fair Labor Standards Act claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Caruthers v. Secretary of Treasury (1985)** This case involved a federal employee who sued the Secretary of Treasury claiming wage theft under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The worker, Caruthers, argued that the Treasury Department had not properly paid wages according to federal wage and hour laws. The court ruled against the employee. Both the lower court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the Secretary of Treasury, rejecting the worker's wage theft claim under the FLSA. **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows that winning wage theft cases against federal employers can be challenging, even under federal labor laws designed to protect workers. The decision demonstrates that government employees face the same burden as private sector workers to prove their wage theft claims with solid evidence and legal arguments. For workers considering similar claims, this case highlights the importance of carefully documenting work hours, pay records, and any wage discrepancies. While the FLSA provides protections for workers, courts will scrutinize claims closely, whether the employer is a private company or a government agency. Workers should gather strong evidence before pursuing wage theft claims and may benefit from consulting with employment attorneys familiar with federal employment law.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.