Skip to main content

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

D.D.C.June 20, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2018-1370
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Court granted WMATA's motion in part and denied it in part. Court upheld prior permanent injunction against arbitrating two 2014 grievances and maintained postponement of 2016 grievance pending resolution of Little v. WMATA litigation. However, court allowed arbitration of the 2017 grievance regarding effects bargaining over the new criminal background check policy to proceed.

What This Ruling Means

**Transit Authority vs. Union Dispute Over Background Checks and Grievances** This case involved a dispute between the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) and its transit workers' union over several workplace grievances and a new criminal background check policy. The transit authority and union disagreed about which complaints could go through arbitration - a process where a neutral third party helps resolve workplace disputes. The court reached a mixed decision. It sided with WMATA on some older grievances from 2014, saying those could not go to arbitration, and kept a 2016 grievance on hold while related discrimination litigation continues. However, the court allowed the union to proceed with arbitrating a 2017 grievance about how WMATA implemented its new criminal background check policy for employees. This matters for transit workers because it shows that unions can still challenge how employers implement new hiring and employment policies, even when courts block other grievances. Workers have the right to have their union negotiate over how policy changes affect them. The decision also demonstrates that workplace disputes can take years to resolve, especially when multiple legal cases are happening at the same time.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.