Skip to main content

Teachers College, Columbia University v. NLRB

D.C. CircuitSeptember 4, 2018No. 17-1151
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Teachers College's petition for review and enforced the NLRB's order requiring the College to provide union-requested information about non-unit employees, finding the College violated its duty to bargain under the NLRA.

What This Ruling Means

**Teachers College vs. NLRB: Court Rules College Must Share Employee Information** Teachers College at Columbia University refused to give a union information about certain employees who weren't part of the union. The union had requested details about non-union workers as part of contract negotiations, arguing they needed this information to properly represent their members. The college said no, claiming the information wasn't relevant to bargaining. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) sided with the union and ordered the college to hand over the requested information. When Teachers College challenged this decision in court, they lost. The Court of Appeals upheld the NLRB's ruling, finding that the college violated its legal duty to bargain in good faith under the National Labor Relations Act. **What this means for workers:** This decision strengthens unions' ability to get information they need during contract negotiations. When employers are required to share relevant employee data, unions can better understand workplace conditions and advocate more effectively for their members. The ruling reinforces that employers can't simply refuse information requests during bargaining – they must cooperate when unions demonstrate the information is needed for representation purposes.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.