Skip to main content

Anglin v. Donohoo

Ohio Ct. App.November 5, 2018No. CA2018-05-025Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hendrickson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court dismissed the appeal for lack of a final appealable order, finding that the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss was not a final order that could be reviewed on appeal.

Excerpt

The appellate court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the trial court's decision denying appellant's motion to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) as an order denying a motion to dismiss is not a final appealable order. Furthermore, as appellants did not file a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration as contemplated by R.C. 2711.02(B) but, rather, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint due to an arbitration provision, the trial court's determination that appellants waived their right to arbitration was not a final appealable order.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** In Anglin v. Donohoo, a dispute arose between workers and their employer, Douglas L. Donohoo CPA Ltd. The workers filed a lawsuit claiming breach of contract and fraud. The employer tried to get the case thrown out of court, arguing that the workers had agreed to resolve disputes through arbitration (a private process outside of court) instead of going to court. The trial court refused to dismiss the case, and the employer appealed that decision. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court dismissed the employer's appeal entirely, but not because of the underlying employment issues. Instead, the court ruled it had no authority to review the case because the trial court's decision was not a "final order" that could be appealed yet. The court also noted that the employer may have given up their right to force arbitration by not following proper legal procedures. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that employers can't always force workplace disputes into arbitration, even when employment contracts contain arbitration clauses. If employers don't follow the correct legal steps to enforce arbitration agreements, they may lose that right. Workers should know that having an arbitration clause in their contract doesn't automatically mean they can't pursue their case in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.