Anglin v. Donohoo
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Hendrickson
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The appellate court dismissed the appeal for lack of a final appealable order, finding that the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss was not a final order that could be reviewed on appeal.
Excerpt
The appellate court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the trial court's decision denying appellant's motion to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) as an order denying a motion to dismiss is not a final appealable order. Furthermore, as appellants did not file a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration as contemplated by R.C. 2711.02(B) but, rather, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint due to an arbitration provision, the trial court's determination that appellants waived their right to arbitration was not a final appealable order.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.